norbipeti.eu/artistry.php

97 lines
5.2 KiB
PHP

<html lang="en">
<head>
<title>Norbi's pitch</title>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<meta name="description" content="NorbiPeti's pitch">
<meta name="keywords" content="programming, mental health, social, music, art">
<meta name="author" content="NorbiPeti">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="index.css">
</head>
<body>
<nav>
<ul>
<li><a href="index.php">Homepage</a></li>
</ul>
</nav>
<h1>Hi</h1>
<p>I'm a programmer from Hungary. My aim is to self-host all of my socials.</p>
<p>And self-host yours too! <i>Yay!</i></p>
<h2>The pitch</h2>
<p>An independently owned collection of social media, ran by artists, connected to the rest of the world.</p>
<p>A loose collaboration with cross-promotion.</p>
<h2>Details</h2>
<p>
There are a lot of interconnected social apps, like Mastodon, Threads (anytime now), PeerTube, Pixelfed etc.
Contrary to the 'big' social media sites like YouTube, Discord, Twitter, you are not locked in to any one of these.
There are no ads, no obscure feed algorithms, no AI using your data (excluding Threads from these).
</p>
<p>
I truly believe that this will be the future of social media because everything works well with each other, no lock-in.
The EU has been moving toward <a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2024/05/big-tech-eu-drop-dead">requiring interoperable platforms</a>
so I expect more large platforms to become like Threads and become compatible with other apps.
</p>
<h3>Proposed platforms</h3>
<ul>
<li>Mastodon (Twitter-like, popular, short text posts)</li>
<li>PeerTube (YouTube-like, fairly popular, videos and livestreams)</li>
<li>Pixelfed (Instagram-like, photos, videos, stories)</li>
<li>Snikket (Messenger-like, end-to-end encrypted chat with calls)</li>
</ul>
<h2>Reach</h2>
<p>Of course, one of the main reasons everyone is stuck with the big ones is because <i>everyone else</i> uses those.</p>
<p>
There are currently around 900 000 active users on the (Twitter-like) Mastodon network.
Can't promise all those people to follow you of course, but I think there's some potential here.
In my experience people are a lot more engaged too (myself included) and more interesting discussions take place.
</p>
<p>My not so secret intention is also to get your community to join as well.</p>
<p>And if/when large companies lose the fight against the EU they'll hopefully join in too.</p>
<p>
However, I should probably note that there have been instances of people being driven out of Mastodon.
The thing is, it's all a big network. There will be all kinds of people. You can't control the entire internet.
</p>
<p>
What you <i>can</i> control however, is what reaches you. And as the owner of the platform there is a lot you can do.
</p>
<p>I ended up following a lot of members of the LGBTQ+ community for example. And lots of techy people of course.</p>
<h2>Cost</h2>
<p>
I'm not really sure about the specifics yet, but one thing is certain: I don't want to do this to get rich,
I want to do this to get everyone on the open internet again. I don't want to pay for all of it by myself of course,
especially if (hopefully <i>when</i>) a lot of people get involved. So I'd love if hosting costs (I'm estimating
$5-$20 per artist, depending on the amount of content) would be covered somehow.
</p>
<h2>Privacy and security</h2>
<p>
The idea is that I set up the technical side of things (and likely provide support), so I would technically
have access to (almost) everything, but we can have a contract that I won't interfere and all.
I would not have access to private chats as those are encrypted.
</p>
<p>
Other than that, a shared instance would make the most sense, meaning the branding and everything should be unified.
Moderator access to everything will be absolutely given as needed and any changes that can be easily done will be.
We could have multiple instances as well, when required, and you can have as much control as needed in that case.
</p>
<p>
Regarding security, everything is kept up to date which greatly reduces the chance of any hack and since it's not
a huge platform, it's less likely to be specifically targeted. All the basic security practices will be done too of course.
I work as a web developer, so I see a lot of what practices are applied for bigger web applications.
Other than that, I've been running my own things for around a year now and haven't had issues.
</p>
<p>
Unlike empty promises, like "we care about your privacy", I will say that as a proponent of free and distributed
networks I will never sell any data or install anything that would.
</p>
<h2>Technical details</h2>
<p>
The setup I'm using for myself and proposing here is not too complicated: install YunoHost that takes care of
basic security features and allows one-click installations of many apps. It automatically gives E-mail addresses
(with the domain of your choice, as long as it can have control over it), chat addresses and single-sign-on on
many apps.
</p>
<!-- TODO: Automations for cross-posting -->
<!-- TODO: Livestreams (need further testing probably) -->
<!-- TODO: Chat -->
</body>
</html>